The American Journal of Human Genetics · 2022 · 97 citations · 23 references
MedicineGeneticsObstetricsMaternal-fetal MedicineMedical GeneticsPrenatal DiagnosisFetal AnomaliesFetal Anomaly DetectionPregnancyPrenatal AssessmentPrenatal CarePrenatal Genetic DiagnosisChromosomal Abnormality ScreeningFetal Chromosomal AbnormalitiesNon-invasive Prenatal TestingNumerical Chromosomal AbnormalitiesPrenatal Anomaly ScreeningPrenatal Genetic ScreeningStructural Chromosomal AberrationsTrisomy Screening
In the TRIDENT-2 study, all pregnant women in the Netherlands are offered genome-wide non-invasive prenatal testing (GW-NIPT) with a choice of receiving either full screening or screening solely for common trisomies. Previous data showed that GW-NIPT can reliably detect common trisomies in the general obstetric population and that this test can also detect other chromosomal abnormalities (additional findings). However, evidence regarding the clinical impact of screening for additional findings is lacking. Therefore, we present follow-up results of the TRIDENT-2 study to determine this clinical impact based on the laboratory and perinatal outcomes of cases with additional findings. Between April 2017 and April 2019, additional findings were detected in 402/110,739 pregnancies (0.36%). For 358 cases, the origin was proven to be either fetal (n = 79; 22.1%), (assumed) confined placental mosaicism (CPM) (n = 189; 52.8%), or maternal (n = 90; 25.1%). For the remaining 44 (10.9%), the origin of the aberration could not be determined. Most fetal chromosomal aberrations were pathogenic and associated with severe clinical phenotypes (61/79; 77.2%). For CPM cases, occurrence of pre-eclampsia (8.5% [16/189] vs 0.5% [754/159,924]; RR 18.5), and birth weight <2.3rd percentile (13.6% [24/177] vs 2.5% [3,892/155,491]; RR 5.5) were significantly increased compared to the general obstetric population. Of the 90 maternal findings, 12 (13.3%) were malignancies and 32 (35.6%) (mosaic) pathogenic copy number variants, mostly associated with mild or no clinical phenotypes. Data from this large cohort study provide crucial information for deciding if and how to implement GW-NIPT in screening programs. Additionally, these data can inform the challenging interpretation, counseling, and follow-up of additional findings.
23
Cell-free DNA Analysis for Noninvasive Examination of Trisomy
Mary E. Norton, Bo Jacobsson, Geeta K. Swamy et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2015 · 812 citations · Full text
Noninvasive Prenatal Testing and Incidental Detection of Occult Maternal Malignancies
Diana W. Bianchi, Darya Chudova, Amy J. Sehnert et al. · JAMA · 2015 · 457 citations
Medicine, Genetics, Obstetrics +15
Obtaining Confidence Intervals for the Risk Ratio in Cohort Studies
Daniela Katz, Jorge Baptista, Stanley P. Azen et al. · Biometrics · 1978 · 421 citations
Karuna R. M. van der Meij, Erik A. Sistermans, Merryn Macville et al. · The American Journal of Human Genetics · 2019 · 374 citations · Full text