Publication | Closed Access
A multi-national, multi-institutional study of assessment of programming skills of first-year CS students
424
Citations
6
References
2001
Year
EngineeringEducationSoftware EngineeringSoftware Engineering EducationProgramming Language TeachingMulti-institutional StudyProgram EvaluationStem EducationProgramming Competency StudentsAutomated AssessmentProgramming LanguagesFirst-year Cs StudentsLearning AnalyticsComputer ScienceSoftware TestingProgram ComprehensionComputer Science CommunityHigher Education AssessmentEducational AssessmentProgramming Methodology
In computer science, an expected outcome of a student's education is programming skill. The study aimed to assess first‑year CS students’ programming competency and spark community dialogue on developing such assessments. The group designed and administered a trial assessment to evaluate students’ programming ability. The assessment of 216 students across four universities revealed low proficiency, with an average score of 22.89/110, indicating many students lack programming skills after introductory courses and prompting a framework for future assessments.
In computer science, an expected outcome of a student's education is programming skill. This working group investigated the programming competency students have as they complete their first one or two courses in computer science. In order to explore options for assessing students, the working group developed a trial assessment of whether students can program. The underlying goal of this work was to initiate dialog in the Computer Science community on how to develop these types of assessments. Several universities participated in our trial assessment and the disappointing results suggest that many students do not know how to program at the conclusion of their introductory courses. For a combined sample of 216 students from four universities, the average score was 22.89 out of 110 points on the general evaluation criteria developed for this study. From this trial assessment we developed a framework of expectations for first-year courses and suggestions for further work to develop more comprehensive assessments.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1