Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open · 2015 · 45 citations · 44 references
MedicinePlastic SurgerySurgeryReconstructive SurgeryRisk AnalysisRisk AssessmentBreast ReconstructionBreast SurgeryPreoperative Risk AssessmentRisk StratificationSurgical ComplicationsSurgical SafetyBreast Surgery ComplicationsComplication Rate AnalysisFree Flap FailureIndividual Risk ModelsIndividualized Risk EvaluationPostoperative Surgical Site InfectionRisk Assessment ModelsSurgical Decision-making
Background: Risk discussion is a central tenet of the dialogue between surgeon and patient. Risk calculators have recently offered a new way to integrate evidence-based practice into the discussion of individualized patient risk and expectation management. Focusing on the comprehensive Tracking Operations and Outcomes for Plastic Surgeons (TOPS) database, we endeavored to add plastic surgical outcomes to the previously developed Breast Reconstruction Risk Assessment (BRA) score. Methods: The TOPS database from 2008 to 2011 was queried for patients undergoing breast reconstruction. Regression models were constructed for the following complications: seroma, dehiscence, surgical site infection (SSI), explantation, flap failure, reoperation, and overall complications. Results: Of 11,992 cases, 4439 met inclusion criteria. Overall complication rate was 15.9%, with rates of 3.4% for seroma, 4.0% for SSI, 6.1% for dehiscence, 3.7% for explantation, 7.0% for flap loss, and 6.4% for reoperation. Individualized risk models were developed with acceptable goodness of fit, accuracy, and internal validity. Distribution of overall complication risk was broad and asymmetric, meaning that the average risk was often a poor estimate of the risk for any given patient. These models were added to the previously developed open-access version of the risk calculator, available at http://www.BRAscore.org. Conclusions: Population-based measures of risk may not accurately reflect risk for many individual patients. In this era of increasing emphasis on evidence-based medicine, we have developed a breast reconstruction risk assessment calculator from the robust TOPS database. The BRA Score tool can aid in individualizing—and quantifying—risk to better inform surgical decision making and better manage patient expectations.
44
The TIMI Risk Score for Unstable Angina/Non–ST Elevation MI
Elliott M. Antman, Marc Cohen, Peter J. L. M. Bernink et al. · JAMA · 2000 · 3.2K citations
Internal validation of predictive models
Ewout W. Steyerberg, Frank E. Harrell, Gerard Borsboom et al. · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2001 · 2.6K citations
Karl Y. Bilimoria, Yaoming Liu, Jennifer L. Paruch et al. · Journal of the American College of Surgeons · 2013 · 1.9K citations · Full text
What do we mean by validating a prognostic model?
Douglas G. Altman, Patrick Royston · Statistics in Medicine · 2000 · 1.4K citations
A Paradigm Shift in U.S. Breast Reconstruction
Claudia R. Albornoz, Peter B. Bach, Babak J. Mehrara et al. · Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery · 2012 · 883 citations
Medicine, Plastic Surgery, Surgery +14