Personalized nudging

Stuart Mills

Behavioural Public Policy · 2020 · 99 citations · 13 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Behavioural nudges often lack precision, sometimes nudging individuals who would have benefited from different interventions if their personal circumstances were known. The paper proposes that personalized nudging, enabled by accessible heterogeneous data, can address this precision problem while examining its regulatory and data‑access challenges. The authors present a two‑component framework that lets choice architects personalize both the target choices and the nudging method, requiring heterogeneous data to do so.

Abstract

Abstract A criticism of behavioural nudges is that they lack precision, sometimes nudging people who – had their personal circumstances been known – would have benefitted from being nudged differently. This problem may be solved through a programme of personalized nudging. This paper proposes a two-component framework for personalization that suggests choice architects can personalize both the choices being nudged towards (choice personalization) and the method of nudging itself (delivery personalization). To do so, choice architects will require access to heterogeneous data. This paper argues that such data need not take the form of big data, but agrees with previous authors that the opportunities to personalize nudges increase as data become more accessible. Finally, this paper considers two challenges that a personalized nudging programme must consider, namely the risk personalization poses to the universality of laws, regulation and social experiences, and the data access challenges policy-makers may encounter.

References

13