Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2019 · 62 citations · 46 references
Life SciencesBiochemistryMolecular BiologyCell SignalingSignal TransductionStructural BiologyBone Morphogenetic Protein SignalingLigand BindingLigand-receptor InteractionsProtein-ligand BindingReceptor-ligand InteractionsSignal Transduction ComplexesMutational Analysis Of BindingMutational Analysis Of DimerizationProtein-ligand Complex AnalysisProtein-ligand Complex StructureReceptor Complex AssemblyReceptor Complex FormationReceptor-ligand Structural BiologyReceptors
TGFβ family ligands, which include the TGFβs, BMPs, and activins, signal by forming a ternary complex with type I and type II receptors. For TGFβs and BMPs, structures of ternary complexes have revealed differences in receptor assembly. However, structural information for how activins assemble a ternary receptor complex is lacking. We report the structure of an activin class member, GDF11, in complex with the type II receptor ActRIIB and the type I receptor Alk5. The structure reveals that receptor positioning is similar to the BMP class, with no interreceptor contacts; however, the type I receptor interactions are shifted toward the ligand fingertips and away from the dimer interface. Mutational analysis shows that ligand type I specificity is derived from differences in the fingertips of the ligands that interact with an extended loop specific to Alk4 and Alk5. The study also reveals differences for how TGFβ and GDF11 bind to the same type I receptor, Alk5. For GDF11, additional contacts at the fingertip region substitute for the interreceptor interactions that are seen for TGFβ, indicating that Alk5 binding to GDF11 is more dependent on direct contacts. In support, we show that a single residue of Alk5 (Phe 84 ), when mutated, abolishes GDF11 signaling, but has little impact on TGFβ signaling. The structure of GDF11/ActRIIB/Alk5 shows that, across the TGFβ family, different mechanisms regulate type I receptor binding and specificity, providing a molecular explanation for how the activin class accommodates low-affinity type I interactions without the requirement of cooperative receptor interactions.
46
Features and development of <i>Coot</i>
Paul Emsley, Bernhard Lohkamp, W. G. Scott et al. · Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography · 2010 · 29.6K citations · Full text
<i>Phaser</i>crystallographic software
Airlie J. McCoy, Ralf W. Grosse‐Kunstleve, Paul D. Adams et al. · Journal of Applied Crystallography · 2007 · 20.9K citations · Full text
Creation of a Bacterial Cell Controlled by a Chemically Synthesized Genome
Daniel G. Gibson, John I. Glass, Carole Lartigue et al. · Science · 2010 · 2.7K citations · Full text
Mechanism of activation of the TGF-β receptor
Jeffrey L. Wrana, Liliana Attisano, Rotraud Wieser et al. · Nature · 1994 · 2.3K citations