Publication | Closed Access
Interactive engagement with embodied agents: an empirically validated framework
47
Citations
18
References
2009
Year
EngineeringAffective DesignHuman-machine InteractionUser-centered DesignCommunicationEmbodied AgentInteractive EngagementAffective ComputingEmbodied RoboticsGame DesignGraphic MessagingHuman Agent InteractionDesignUser ExperiencePerformance StudiesMedia DesignVirtual WorldsSocial ComputingEmbodied AgentsHuman-computer InteractionArtsSatisfying Embodied Agents
The framework is important scientifically and offers designers dos and don’ts for creating more satisfying embodied agents across task domains and social settings. The study presents an empirically tested theoretical framework to explain user engagement and end‑user satisfaction with interactive agents. The authors conducted multidisciplinary experiments to verify the mechanisms underlying interaction and engagement with embodied agents in various task domains. Results show that realism and aesthetic beauty are not the primary drivers of liking; instead, affordances and ethics better explain user responses, leading to guidelines for designers and future research. © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Abstract This paper presents an empirically tested theoretical framework to explain user engagement and end‐user satisfaction with interactive agents. Such a framework is not only important from a scientific point of view; application designers may find a set of dos and don'ts that help them create more satisfying embodied agents in different task domains and social settings. From a multidisciplinary perspective, we have conducted a series of experiments to verify underlying mechanisms in the processes of interacting and engaging with embodied agents in various task domains. Our results show that the most commonly held views are not always tenable; sometimes other factors provide better explanations for liking an embodied agent or end‐user satisfaction. For example, it is not realism but rather affordances and ethics that are key for understanding user responses, and a beautiful design is not always the most preferable. From our results, guidelines for designers and future research are reflected upon. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1