Nature Communications · 2021 · 27 citations · 64 references
EngineeringHigh-performance ComputingBiomolecular ModelingComputational BiologyComputational ChemistryComputational ModelingMolecular ModelingBiomolecular SimulationComputational Biology ModelsComputational ReproducibilityHigh PerformanceScientific Modeling Tools
Each year vast international resources are wasted on irreproducible research. The scientific community has been slow to adopt standard software engineering practices, despite the increases in high-dimensional data, complexities of workflows, and computational environments. Here we show how scientific software applications can be created in a reproducible manner when simple design goals for reproducibility are met. We describe the implementation of a test server framework and 40 scientific benchmarks, covering numerous applications in Rosetta bio-macromolecular modeling. High performance computing cluster integration allows these benchmarks to run continuously and automatically. Detailed protocol captures are useful for developers and users of Rosetta and other macromolecular modeling tools. The framework and design concepts presented here are valuable for developers and users of any type of scientific software and for the scientific community to create reproducible methods. Specific examples highlight the utility of this framework, and the comprehensive documentation illustrates the ease of adding new tests in a matter of hours.
64
The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship
Mark D. Wilkinson, Michel Dumontier, IJsbrand Jan Aalbersberg et al. · Scientific Data · 2016 · 17.8K citations · Full text
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science
1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility
Monya Baker · Nature · 2016 · 4.3K citations
Andrew Leaver‐Fay, Michael D. Tyka, Steven M. Lewis et al. · Methods in enzymology on CD-ROM/Methods in enzymology · 2010 · 2K citations