BMC Genomics · 2021 · 17 citations · 42 references
Life SciencesGeneticsMolecular GeneticsGenomic Data AnalysisGenomicsMedical GeneticsGenome SequencingGenotype ImputationGenotyping PlatformsNext-generation SequencingVariant AnalysisBiomedical ApplicationsGenetic Reference PanelsGenome ImputationPopulation Genetic VariationPopulation Reference PanelsPopulation-specific ImputationUnderrepresented PopulationsWhole Genome Sequencing Studies
BACKGROUND: Historically, geneticists have relied on genotyping arrays and imputation to study human genetic variation. However, an underrepresentation of diverse populations has resulted in arrays that poorly capture global genetic variation, and a lack of reference panels. This has contributed to deepening global health disparities. Whole genome sequencing (WGS) better captures genetic variation but remains prohibitively expensive. Thus, we explored WGS at "mid-pass" 1-7x coverage. RESULTS: Here, we developed and benchmarked methods for mid-pass sequencing. When applied to a population without an existing genomic reference panel, 4x mid-pass performed consistently well across ethnicities, with high recall (98%) and precision (97.5%). CONCLUSION: Compared to array data imputed into 1000 Genomes, mid-pass performed better across all metrics and identified novel population-specific variants with potential disease relevance. We hope our work will reduce financial barriers for geneticists from underrepresented populations to characterize their genomes prior to biomedical genetic applications.
42
A global reference for human genetic variation
Richard Durbin, Peter Donnelly, Paul Flicek et al. · Nature · 2015 · 20K citations · Full text
A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data
Mark A. DePristo, Eric Banks, Ryan Poplin et al. · Nature Genetics · 2011 · 12.4K citations · Full text
A reference panel of 64,976 haplotypes for genotype imputation
Michael Boehnke · Nature Genetics · 2016 · 3.3K citations · Full text