“I'm a salesman and my client is China”: Language learning motivation, multicultural attitudes, and multilingualism among university students in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan

Raees Calafato

System · 2021 · 35 citations · 59 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

Central Asian republics offer a unique, under‑studied context for examining how language‑learning motivation, multicultural attitudes, and multilingualism interact amid cultural diversity and state‑driven multilingual education. This study surveyed 235 university students in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan to assess their language‑learning motivation, integrativeness, and international posture, and to determine how multilingual proficiency influences multicultural attitudes and prejudice. Participants were learning a range of languages—including Arabic, Chinese, English, French, German, Japanese, Russian, Spanish, and Turkish—with most studying two or more languages simultaneously, and data were collected via a structured questionnaire. Results showed gender differences in perceived benefits of multilingualism, links between native multilingualism and more positive multicultural attitudes and lower prejudice, and that international posture and integrativeness are distinct, minimally overlapping constructs.

Abstract

The Central Asian republics represent an interesting yet little-studied space for researching the interplay between language learning motivation (LLM), multiculturalism, and multilingualism given their cultural and linguistic diversity and official promotion of multilingualism and positive multicultural attitudes through language learning initiatives in schools and universities. This article reports on a questionnaire study that investigated the LLM of 235 university students in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan, including their integrativeness and international posture. The students were learning Arabic, Chinese, English, French, German, Japanese, Russian, Spanish, and Turkish, with a majority of them learning two or more languages concurrently. The study also explored their views regarding the benefits of being multilingual and the extent to which their level of multilingualism, both formally and natively acquired, affected their multicultural attitudes and levels of prejudice towards outgroups. The findings revealed statistically significant gender differences in how the participants viewed the benefits of being multilingual, as well as statistically significant relationships between their levels of natively acquired multilingualism and their multicultural attitudes and levels of prejudice towards outgroups. International posture and integrativeness, meanwhile, were found to be distinct concepts with little overlap.

References

59