The China Quarterly · 2021 · 12 citations · 30 references
Public AffairsPublic AdministrationVocational EducationApprenticeship EducationInstitutional TheoryWorkforce DevelopmentApprenticeship GovernanceApprenticeship PolicyTalent DevelopmentVocational Education PolicyVocational Education ReformVocational Training PolicyApprenticeship Governance ReformApprenticeship Institutional GovernanceApprenticeship Sector GovernanceApprenticeship System GovernanceGovernance Of Vocational InstitutionsVocational Training Reform
Abstract The Chinese government has placed workforce upskilling at the core of its reform agenda to sustain the Chinese “economic miracle.” As such, the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security (MOHRSS) and Ministry of Education (MOE) have each launched separate apprenticeship reforms geared towards enhancing China's oft-criticized vocational education and training system. Using a self-constructed theoretical framework, this article examines the two reforms and ascribes their divergent outcomes to the two ministries’ distinct approaches to institutionalizing their central initiatives (i.e. the top-down model followed by the MOHRSS versus the collaborative model of the MOE). However, given the absence of industry-level civil society governance in China, neither of these models has delivered ideal training outcomes, although the collaborative model has satisfied more employers and apprentices. China's skills-development reforms have thus become trapped in an institutional dilemma which is likely to impede the long-term economic restructuring efforts of the central state.
30
Qualitative evaluation and research methods
Michael Quinn Patton · 1990 · 21.8K citations
Qualitative evaluation and research methods
David Ellis · International Journal of Information Management · 1990 · 18.2K citations