Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment · 2021 · 184 citations · 36 references
Public HealthTransportation PlanningUrban PolicyTransportTransportationTransportation PolicyShared MobilitySustainable TransportSustainable TransportationTransport EquityTransportation EquityUrban MobilityEquity In MobilityPublic Transportation EquityScooter SharingShared Mobility PolicyShared Mobility UseTransportation Equity AnalysisUrban Mobility SharingUrban Transportation Equity
Shared micro‑mobility services have surged in popularity, posing policy challenges for cities while a lack of scientific insight hampers understanding of user correlates that are crucial for transportation equity. The study aims to provide an up‑to‑date account of shared micro‑mobility adoption and user characteristics in Zurich, Switzerland. The authors analyze adoption and user characteristics of shared micro‑mobility in Zurich, Switzerland. The study finds that shared micro‑mobility users are predominantly young, university‑educated males in affluent households, with e‑scooter users being younger yet more representative of the general population, indicating potential equity benefits but also higher life‑cycle emissions and skewed contributions due to many student users.
Shared micro-mobility services have rapidly gained popularity yet challenged city administrations to develop adequate policies while scientific insight is largely missing. From a transportation equity perspective, it is particularly important to understand user correlates, as they are the beneficiaries from public investment and reallocation of public space. This paper provides an up-to-date account of shared micro-mobility adoption and user characteristics in Zurich, Switzerland. Our results suggest that shared micro-mobility users tend to be young, university-educated males with full-time employment living in affluent households without children or cars. Shared e-scooter users, in particular, are younger, yet more representative of the general population in terms of education, full-time employment, income and gender than bike-sharing users. This suggests that shared e-scooters may contribute to transportation equity, yet their promotion should be handled with care as life-cycle emissions exceed those of bike-sharing and equity contributions might be skewed as many users are students.
36
Distributive Justice, Equity, and Equality
Karen S. Cook, Karen A. Hegtvedt · Annual Review of Sociology · 1983 · 551 citations