Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2021 · 64 citations · 7 references
ComputingComputer ScienceHealth InformaticsClinical InformaticsComputer VisionMachine LearningComputer-aided DiagnosisDiagnostic Decision SupportDiagnostic EvaluationDiagnostic Test EvaluationInfectious Disease DetectionRapid Diagnostic TestsArtificial Intelligence For DetectionDiagnostic Testing AccuracyPatient Self-assessmentPatient Self-testingRapid Disease DiagnosticsSars-cov-2 InfectionSmartphone-based DiagnosticsVisual Interpretation
Serological rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are widely used across pathologies, often providing users a simple, binary result (positive or negative) in as little as 5 to 20 min. Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, new RDTs for identifying SARS-CoV-2 have rapidly proliferated. However, these seemingly easy-to-read tests can be highly subjective, and interpretations of the visible "bands" of color that appear (or not) in a test window may vary between users, test models, and brands. We developed and evaluated the accuracy/performance of a smartphone application (xRCovid) that uses machine learning to classify SARS-CoV-2 serological RDT results and reduce reading ambiguities. Across 11 COVID-19 RDT models, the app yielded 99.3% precision compared to reading by eye. Using the app replaces the uncertainty from visual RDT interpretation with a smaller uncertainty of the image classifier, thereby increasing confidence of clinicians and laboratory staff when using RDTs, and creating opportunities for patient self-testing.
7
Antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in patients with COVID-19
Quanxin Long, Bai-Zhong Liu, Haijun Deng et al. · Nature Medicine · 2020 · 3.1K citations · Full text
Hervé Boutal, Anaïs Vogel, Sandrine Bernabeu et al. · Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · 2017 · 222 citations · Full text
Diagnostic Indexes of a Rapid IgG/IgM Combined Antibody Test for SARS-CoV-2
Liu Ying, Yueping Liu, Bo Diao et al. · medRxiv · 2020 · 106 citations · Full text