West European Politics · 2021 · 145 citations · 50 references
Covid-19 CrisisPolicy CooperationPublic PolicyFederal Decision MakingGovernment AdministrationFederal StatesInternational RelationsGlobal Health CrisisGovernment RegulationInternational OrganizationUnilateral/coordinated Decision MakingCrisis ManagementGovernment PolicyPolitical ScienceSocial SciencesGeopolitics
The ability of federal states to manage the COVID-19 pandemic has created much debate. Federations differ considerably in the way they have been tackling the crisis, however. To shed light on how European federations (Austria, Germany, Switzerland) managed COVID-19, this paper distinguishes two dimensions of federal decision making: centralised/decentralised and unilateral/coordinated decision making. Drawing on official government documents and press reports, it examines decisions on the introduction of containment measures and their subsequent easing during the first wave. While Austria and Switzerland adopted a centralised approach, decentralised decision making prevailed in Germany. However, most decisions were coordinated between the governments at the federal and constituent unit level in Austria and Germany, in contrast to Switzerland where unilateralism prevailed. This difference in approaches can partly be explained by the distribution of powers. Political and economic factors also influenced the choice of crisis management strategies.
50
A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures
Charles M. Tiebout · Journal of Political Economy · 1956 · 13K citations
American Economic Review · 2012 · 6.8K citations
Case study research: principles and practices
John Gerring · Choice Reviews Online · 2007 · 4.2K citations
Empirical Case Study, Social Research, Project Management +16
The Power to Tax: Analytical Foundations of a Fiscal Constitution.
A. R. Prest, Geoffrey Brennan, James M. Buchanan · Economica · 1981 · 1.4K citations