The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit's Impact on Patent Litigation

Matthew Henry, John L. Turner

SSRN Electronic Journal · 2005 · 17 citations · 18 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, established in 1982, unifies patent law and has generated a new body of patent jurisprudence with potentially wide economic effects. This study aims to identify and explain the CAFC’s impact on patent litigation, patenting, and inventive activity amid rising patent filings and lawsuits. We analyze a novel dataset of over 6,000 USPQ decisions from 1953 to 2002 to assess these effects.

Abstract

With its powerful mandate to unify patent law, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC), established in 1982, represents an intriguing recent example of an institutional innovation with potentially broad economic consequences. Given sole responsibility for handling patent appeals and widely regarded as pro-patent, the CAFC has indeed produced a new body of patent law. Unfortunately, research has yet to identify and explain accurately its impact on patent litigation, patenting and inventive activity. Given that both the amount of patent litigation and the number of patents have grown substantially during the last twenty years, the time is ripe to address this directly. We present and analyze a novel data set, spanning 1953-2002, that reflects more than 6,000 decisions published in the United States Patents Quarterly (USPQ).

References

18