ACS Omega · 2020 · 92 citations · 45 references
EngineeringBioengineeringBiomedical EngineeringBiocompatibilityBiomaterialsTissue EngineeringBone Graft MaterialsBone Tissue EngineeringImplant MaterialsScaffold DesignScaffold FabricationTissue Engineering Scaffolds3D-printed ScaffoldsBone Graft ScaffoldsBone IngrowthImplant FabricationOrthopedic ImplantsOsseointegrationPorous ScaffoldsThree-dimensional Printed Scaffolds
Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) constitutes a preferred alternative material for orthopedic implants owing to its good mechanical properties and biocompatibility. However, the poor osseointegration property of PEEK implants has limited their clinical applications. To address this issue, in this study, we investigated the mechanical and biological properties of fully porous PEEK scaffolds with different pore sizes both in vitro and in vivo. PEEK scaffolds with designed pore sizes of 300, 450, and 600 μm and a porosity of 60% were manufactured via fused deposition modeling (FDM) to explore the optimum pore size. Smooth solid PEEK cylinders (PEEK-S) were used as the reference material. The mechanical, cytocompatibility, proliferative, and osteogenic properties of PEEK scaffolds were characterized in comparison to those of PEEK-S. In vivo dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, microcomputed tomography, and histological observation were performed after 4 and 12 weeks of implantation to evaluate the microvascular perfusion and bone formation afforded by the various PEEK implants using a New Zealand white rabbit model with distal femoral condyle defects. Results of in vitro testing supported the good biocompatibility of the porous PEEK scaffolds manufactured via FDM. In particular, the PEEK-450 scaffolds were most beneficial for cell adhesion, proliferation, and osteogenic differentiation. Results of in vivo analysis further indicated that PEEK-450 scaffolds exhibited preferential potential for bone ingrowth and vascular perfusion. Together, our findings support that porous PEEK implants designed with a suitable pore size and fabricated via three-dimensional printing constitute promising alternative biomaterials for bone grafting and tissue engineering applications with marked potential for clinical applications.
45
Naoya Taniguchi, Shunsuke Fujibayashi, Mitsuru Takemoto et al. · Materials Science and Engineering C · 2015 · 944 citations · Full text
Natural Sciences, Materials Science, Orthopaedic Surgery +17
Simon Van Bael, Yoke Chin Chai, Silvia Truscello et al. · Acta Biomaterialia · 2012 · 761 citations