International Journal of Management Reviews · 2020 · 865 citations · 133 references
ManagementOrganization StudiesOrganizational BehaviorChange MeasurementOrganizational DesignOrganizational DevelopmentOrganizational ResilienceResilience AssessmentConcept ClarityOrganizational RecoveryOrganizational Resilience AssessmentResilienceResilience Assessment FrameworksResilience ManagementResilience Measurement
Resilience has recently gained momentum in organization studies as a promising concept for explaining how organizations survive and thrive amid adversity or turbulence. The paper aims to systematically review organizational resilience, identify conceptual problems, and propose a clearer, more parsimonious construct for future research. The authors analyze existing literature, critique the fuzziness of resilience, and apply construct‑development and taxonomy frameworks to assess conceptual and operational issues. The review reveals that empirical research on organizational resilience lacks measurement clarity and recommends future studies to develop clearer measurement approaches.
Abstract Recently, the concept of resilience has gained new momentum in organization studies. It is held to be a very promising concept to explain how organizations can survive and thrive amidst adversity or turbulence. However, findings from an earlier review about resilience in the organizational and business context show that, although empirical research on the concept has increased, there is still a need for more clarity in terms of its measurement. The aim of this paper is to present a systematic review of the organizational resilience construct that covers both conceptual and operational issues. We discuss why researchers criticize resilience for being fuzzy and move on to identify and analyse existing literature under the lens of construct development and taxonomies. With this study, we aim to point out conceptual problems for future researchers to address conceptual clarity and to develop a clearer, more parsimonious concept. We conclude with a suggestion about future measurement.
133
The metatheory of resilience and resiliency
Glenn E. Richardson · Journal of Clinical Psychology · 2002 · 2.5K citations · Full text
David Fletcher, Mustafa Sarkar · European Psychologist · 2013 · 2.4K citations · Full text