Antibody Validation for Protein Expression on Tissue Slides: A Protocol for Immunohistochemistry

Tyler MacNeil, Ioannis Vathiotis, Sandra Martínez-Morilla, Vesal Yaghoobi, Jon Zugazagoitia, Yuting Liu, David L. Rimm

BioTechniques · 2020 · 61 citations · 26 references

DOIFull text

Open access

TL;DR

Antibodies are essential for research and clinical decisions, yet no standardized guidelines exist, leading to variable validation practices outside clinical laboratories. The study focuses on immunohistochemistry, underscoring the need for rigorous antibody validation in this pivotal diagnostic and research tool. The authors present a protocol for validating antibodies in immunohistochemistry, incorporating key pillars from Uhlen et al. The protocol exemplifies a rigorous 2016 approach to developing antibody‑based tests for both basic and translational science labs and clinical settings.

Abstract

Antibodies play a crucial role in basic research and clinical decision-making. However, there are no standardized algorithms or guidelines to ensure their accuracy and validity. There have been efforts to generate consensus, but, with the exception of clinical labs, antibody validation remains variable in the literature and sometimes in clinical practice. Here we focus on immunohistochemistry, an example of a scientific and clinical tool where validation of antibodies is critical. We describe a protocol that we use to validate antibodies specifically for immunohistochemistry, including some of the pillars of antibody validation from Uhlen et al. 2016, as an example of a rigorous approach to build antibody-based tests for both basic and translational science labs and for the clinic.

References

26