Stats · 2020 · 41 citations · 126 references
EducationBiostatisticsMeasurement InvariancePsychometricsStatistical ModelingConfigural InvarianceGeneralized Linear ModelsLatent Variable ModelingMultigroup Measurement InvarianceStructural Equation ModelingStructural InvarianceAsymptotic NormalityCross-group Measurement InvarianceLatent Mean DifferencesLatent Mean EstimationLink FunctionsLinking ErrorsPower ValuesRobust Loss Functions
The comparison of group means in latent variable models plays a vital role in empirical research in the social sciences. The present article discusses an extension of invariance alignment and Haberman linking by choosing the robust power loss function ρ(x)=|x|p(p>0). This power loss function with power values p smaller than one is particularly suited for item responses that are generated under partial invariance. For a general class of linking functions, asymptotic normality of estimates is shown. Moreover, the theory of M-estimation is applied for obtaining linking errors (i.e., inference with respect to a population of items) for this class of linking functions. In a simulation study, it is shown that invariance alignment and Haberman linking have comparable performance, and in some conditions, the newly proposed robust Haberman linking outperforms invariance alignment. In three examples, the influence of the choice of a particular linking function on the estimation of group means is demonstrated. It is concluded that the choice of the loss function in linking is related to structural assumptions about the pattern of noninvariance in item parameters.
126
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team · 2000 · 353K citations · Full text
Natural Sciences, Computer Science, Statistical Computing +10
Measurement Invariance, Factor Analysis and Factorial Invariance
William Meredith · Psychometrika · 1993 · 4.5K citations
The incidental parameter problem since 1948
Tony Lancaster · Journal of Econometrics · 2000 · 1.1K citations