IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics · 2020 · 35 citations · 23 references
EngineeringElectrical EngineeringMicroelectronicsPower ElectronicsSemiconductor DevicesDevice CharacterizationDevice SimulationHeat ConductionSemiconductor ReliabilityTemperature MeasurementThermal Properties Of SemiconductorsCurrent Measurement AccuracyDelay Timing MeasurementElectrothermal SimulationHeat GenerationLifetime ModelingMeasurement AccuracyThermal Management Of Semiconductor Devices
The lifetime evaluation is strongly influenced by the measurement accuracy of the junction temperature with the V <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">ce</sub> (T) method during power cycling test (PCT). However, the measurement delay time tmd, the time between which the load current is switched off and the test pulse is applied, induces a maximum junction-temperature offset ΔT <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">jm</sub> . The JEDEC [1] suggested square root t method is found only to be suitable for devices with surface-close heat generation and will induce errors for other devices such as IGBTs. In this article, two novel methods, the simulated ΔZ <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">th</sub> and the Cauer thermal model, are proposed. The principle and accuracy of these two methods are discussed in detail. Furthermore, the measured Z <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">th</sub> curve, or the Foster thermal model method, is proven not suitable for the correction of the maximum junction-temperature offset, as it will induce the same error as the square root t method.
23
Fast power cycling test of IGBT modules in traction application
Martin Held, P. Jacob, G. Nicoletti et al. · 2002 · 565 citations