Journal of Infrared Millimeter and Terahertz Waves · 2020 · 18 citations · 18 references
EngineeringElectrical EngineeringMaterials ScienceMaterials CharacterizationMicrowave EngineeringOptical MaterialsMicrowave MaterialsMicrowave MeasurementsMicrowave Network AnalysisMicrowave Transmission LinesTerahertz PhotonicsTerahertz SpectroscopyDielectric CharacterizationLow-loss MaterialsMaterial Parameter EstimationPermittivityPermittivity MeasurementRandom ErrorsSystematic UncertaintiesUncertainty Sensitivity Coefficients
Abstract Material parameter extraction algorithms are studied and simplified both for transmission-reflection and transmission-only methods. The simplified relations, which are closed-form in some cases, are analyzed to establish the uncertainty sensitivity coefficients and therefore, to clarify the main uncertainty contributions and reduce the systematic and random errors. Simple closed-form expressions presented in this paper show the sensitivity of the extracted permittivity to each input parameter such as S 21 (phase and amplitude), frequency, and the material thickness. Results are presented for several material slabs for three waveguide frequency ranges 75–110 GHz, 140–220 GHz, and 500–750 GHz using VNA-based free-space technique in the THz domain. Comparison of results (and the associated uncertainties) between different algorithms can help to choose the optimal one suitable for lossy or low-loss materials, and thin or thicker slabs. This can explain why the same set of S -parameters data usually gives different final results (permittivity and permeability) with different algorithms and verify the reliability of the calibration and extraction process.
18