Publication | Closed Access
Muting or Meddling? Advocacy as a Relational Communication Strategy Affecting Organization–Public Relationships and Stakeholder Response
68
Citations
35
References
2020
Year
OrganizationsSocial InfluencePublic OpinionCommunicationStakeholder AnalysisPublic RelationsKey PublicsSocial SciencesManagementCommunication StrategyStakeholder EngagementPolitical CommunicationCommunication ActivismCivic EngagementAdvocacyOrganizational AdvocacyStrategic CommunicationCommunication EffectsSocial OrganizationCommunication StudyStakeholder ResponsePublic Relation StrategyRelational Communication StrategyOrganizational CommunicationInterpersonal CommunicationAdvocacy CommunicationRelational CommunicationArts
This article conceptualizes organizational advocacy as a relational communication strategy by which organizations take stances on controversial, sociopolitical issues to signal shared commitment with key publics. The authors conducted a series of two-by-two experimental surveys—controlling whether an organization took a defined position (advocacy vs. silence) and whether it acted alone or in line with peers (leader vs. follower)—across both less partisan (Study 1) and highly partisan (Study 2) issues. Findings indicate advocacy is an effective relational communication strategy that strengthens organization–public relationships (OPRs) and increases publics’ support for the organization. Theoretical contributions and practical applications are discussed.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1