Publication | Open Access
Reviewing assessment of student learning in interdisciplinary STEM education
256
Citations
51
References
2020
Year
Integrative LearningEducationStem Teacher DevelopmentHigher Education TeachingAbstract Stem EducationInterdisciplinary LearningProgram EvaluationStem EducationTransdisciplinary PerspectiveLearning SciencesSecondary Stem EducationEducational TestingEducational MeasurementMultidisciplinary EngineeringHigher EducationInterdisciplinary Stem EducationStudent AssessmentInterdisciplinary EducationHigher Education AssessmentEducational Assessment
STEM education has gained attention, yet developing valid and reliable assessment of interdisciplinary learning remains challenging. This study is a comprehensive review of interdisciplinary STEM assessment over the past two decades. The authors examined 49 empirical studies and created a two‑dimensional framework that classifies assessments by discipline type (monodisciplinary, interdiscipline, transdiscipline) and by learning objectives (knowledge, skill, practice, affective domain). The review found that most assessments focused on monodisciplinary knowledge and affective domains, with limited alignment to interdisciplinary program goals, leading to recommendations for more appropriate assessment development.
Abstract STEM education has received increasing attention in recent years. However, developing valid and reliable assessment of interdisciplinary learning in STEM has been a challenge. This study is a comprehensive review of assessment of interdisciplinary STEM education during the last two decades. A total of 49 empirical research articles were collected from an initial library of 635 articles focusing on interdisciplinary STEM education. A two-dimensional framework was developed to examine the literature. The first dimension concerns the nature of disciplines being assessed and includes three categories: monodisciplinary, interdiscipline, and transdiscipline. The second dimension concerns the learning objectives and includes four aspects: knowledge, skill, practice, and affective domain. The results show that most assessments focused on assessments of monodisciplinary knowledge, monodisciplinary affective domains, and transdisciplinary affective domains. Although many programs aimed to improve students’ interdisciplinary understanding or skills, their assessments did not align with their aims. Based on the review, future directions are proposed for developing assessments for interdisciplinary STEM educational programs.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1