PLoS ONE · 2020 · 46 citations · 27 references
Natural ResourcesEcologyForestryForest ConservationForest EcologyForest ManagementBiodiversity Conservation In ForestsForest BiodiversityForest Resource ManagementSpecies Composition AssessmentTree ManagementAlpha DiversityAlpha Diversity EstimationForest Management PracticesSilvicultural RegimesSilvicultural Treatment EvaluationSilvicultural TreatmentsTemperate Forest ManagementTotal Tree Volume
An important challenge for silvicultural practices is the conservation of tree diversity while fulfilling the traditional objectives of forest management, most notably timber harvesting. The purpose of this study was to compare the tree diversity before and after the application of silvicultural treatments in a temperate forest in northern Mexico. Fifteen experimental plots, each measuring 2500 m2, were established to evaluate the immediate effect of four silvicultural treatments. These treatments were identified by their levels of management: intensive (clearcut, removal 100%), semi-intensive (removal of 59-61% of basal area), conservative (removal of 29-31% of basal area), and a control group. New forest guidelines, in contrast to conventional approaches, were applied to the semi-intensive and conservative treatments based on health and diversity conditions. Basal area, canopy cover, tree and total volume were measured in each plot. The Importance Value Index, alpha diversity, and evenness were estimated before and after treatments. Eighteen species belonging to five genera and five families were found in the study area. The species with the highest ecological values were Pinus durangensis, P. teocote, Quercus sideroxyla, and Quercus convallata with IVI numbers between 13.6 and 24.5%. Alpha diversity was intermediate (Margalef: 2.9 to 3.8), while dominance and evenness were above average compared to other studies (Simpson: 0.69 to 0.77; Shannon-Wiener: 1.44 to 1.6; Pielou: 0.76 to 0.85). The species evenness index in the conservative treatment was high (Sorensen, Jaccard, quantitative Sorensen and Morisita-Horn; 88 to 99%), although abundance decreased. Overall, there were no significant differences in IVI values and diversity indicators before and after treatments, with the exception of the clearcut treatment. When associating the diversity indices with stand variables, only the Pielou's evenness index showed a significant relationship between them. We concluded that both the conservative and semi-intensive treatments did not generate significant changes in tree diversity, but the former had slightly higher alpha diversity indices. These results can provide a better insight on silvicultural practices and their effects on species composition.
27
Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems
C. S. Holling · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · 1973 · 17.8K citations · Full text
Life Sciences, Biology, Ecology +8
Measuring biological diversity
Anne E. Magurran · Choice Reviews Online · 2004 · 6.7K citations
High plant diversity is needed to maintain ecosystem services
Forest Isbell, Vincent Calcagno, Andy Hector et al. · Nature · 2011 · 1.6K citations · Full text