arXiv (Cornell University) · 2020 · 125 citations · 104 references
ComputingComputer ScienceArtificial IntelligenceComputer SecuritySafety EngineeringAlgorithmic FairnessAlgorithmic GovernanceArtificial Intelligence GovernanceArtificial Intelligence PolicyEthics Of Automated Decision-makingPrivacy PolicyArtificial Intelligence Governance EthicsArtificial Intelligence PrivacyArtificial Intelligence SafetyData Privacy ProtectionHuman Oversight Of AiResponsible AiSecurity Of Ai SystemsTrustworthy Ai
With the recent wave of progress in artificial intelligence (AI) has come a\ngrowing awareness of the large-scale impacts of AI systems, and recognition\nthat existing regulations and norms in industry and academia are insufficient\nto ensure responsible AI development. In order for AI developers to earn trust\nfrom system users, customers, civil society, governments, and other\nstakeholders that they are building AI responsibly, they will need to make\nverifiable claims to which they can be held accountable. Those outside of a\ngiven organization also need effective means of scrutinizing such claims. This\nreport suggests various steps that different stakeholders can take to improve\nthe verifiability of claims made about AI systems and their associated\ndevelopment processes, with a focus on providing evidence about the safety,\nsecurity, fairness, and privacy protection of AI systems. We analyze ten\nmechanisms for this purpose--spanning institutions, software, and hardware--and\nmake recommendations aimed at implementing, exploring, or improving those\nmechanisms.\n
104
Laurens van der Maaten, Geoffrey E. Hinton · Journal of Machine Learning Research · 2008 · 35.7K citations
SMOTE: Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique
Nitesh V. Chawla, Kevin W. Bowyer, Lawrence Hall et al. · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · 2002 · 31.2K citations · Full text
Marco Túlio Ribeiro, Sameer Singh, Carlos Guestrin · 2016 · 15.2K citations