Clinical Cancer Research · 2019 · 88 citations · 45 references
MedicineImmunologyOncologyCancer ImmunologyImmunotherapyTumor ProgressionCancer ImmunotherapyCheckpoint Inhibitor TherapyCombination ImmunotherapyImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmune Checkpoint RegulationTherapy Response AssessmentCheckpoint Inhibitor AntibodiesCheckpoint Therapeutic AntibodiesHyperprogressive DiseaseImmune Checkpoint Inhibitor ResponseImmune Checkpoint Inhibitor TherapyImmune Checkpoint ResistanceRecist CriteriaTumor Growth Rate
Abstract Purpose: Most hyperprogression disease (HPD) definitions are based on tumor growth rate (TGR). However, there is still no consensus on how to evaluate this phenomenon. Patients and Methods: We investigated two independent cohorts of patients with advanced solid tumors treated in phase I trials with (i) programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/PD-L1 antibodies in monotherapy or combination and (ii) targeted agents (TA) in unapproved indications. A Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1–based definition of hyperprogression was developed. The primary endpoint was the assessment of the rate of HPD in patients treated with ICIs or TAs using both criteria (RECIST and TGR) and the impact on overall survival (OS) in patients who achieved PD as best response. Results: Among 270 evaluable patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, 29 PD-1/PD-L1–treated patients (10.7%) had HPD by RECIST definition. This group had a significantly lower OS (median of 5.23 months; 95% CI, 3.97–6.45) when compared with the non-HPD progressor group (median, 7.33 months; 95% CI, 4.53–10.12; HR = 1.73, 95% CI, 1.05–2.85; P = 0.04). In a subset of 221 evaluable patients, 14 (6.3%) were categorized as HPD using TGR criteria, differences in median OS (mOS) between this group (mOS 4.2 months; 95% IC, 2.07–6.33) and non-HPD progressors (n = 44) by TGR criteria (mOS 6.27 months; 95% CI, 3.88–8.67) were not statistically significant (HR 1.4, 95% IC, 0.70–2.77; P = 0.346). Among 239 evaluable patients treated with TAs, 26 (10.9%) were classified as having HPD by RECIST and 14 using TGR criteria in a subset of patients. No differences in OS were observed between HPD and non-HPD progressors treated with TAs. Conclusions: HPD measured by TGR or by RECIST was observed in both cohorts of patients; however, in our series, there was an impact on survival only in the immune-checkpoint inhibitor cohort when evaluated by RECIST. We propose a new way to capture HPD using RECIST criteria that is intuitive and easy to use in daily clinical practice.
45
Improved Survival with Ipilimumab in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma
F. Stephen Hodi, Steven O’Day, David F. McDermott et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2010 · 15.2K citations · Full text
Pembrolizumab versus Chemotherapy for PD-L1–Positive Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Martin Reck, Delvys Rodríguez‐Abreu, Andrew Robinson et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2016 · 10.1K citations · Full text
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacology +17
Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Nonsquamous Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
H. Borghaei, L. Paz-Ares, Leora Horn et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2015 · 9.5K citations · Full text
PD-1 Blockade in Tumors with Mismatch-Repair Deficiency
Dung T. Le, Jennifer N. Uram, Hao Wang et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2015 · 9.4K citations · Full text
Life Sciences, Immunology, Oncology +17
Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab or Monotherapy in Untreated Melanoma
James Larkin, Vanna Chiarion‐Sileni, René González et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2015 · 8.1K citations · Full text