Journal of adhesive dentistry/The journal of adhesive dentistry · 2007 · 16 citations · 39 references
DentistryMaterials EngineeringMaterials ScienceDental MaterialsMechanical Behavior Of MaterialsMechanical Properties Of Dental MaterialsAdhesive BondingDental AdhesivesDentin BondingDentin StructureStrength PropertiesAdhesive Interface StressBond Failure ModesBond StrengthDentin Bonding AgentsFinite Element Stress AnalysisFracture SurfacesMicrotensile Bond StrengthStress Distribution
PURPOSE: To correlate the microtensile bond strength (microTBS) of dentin bonding agents to dentin for different hourglass designs with the stress distribution across the adhesive interface utilizing finite element stress analysis (FEA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adper Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus dentin bonding agent was bonded to flat dentin surfaces in three experimental groups. A 5- to 6-mm layer of resin composite (Filtek Supreme, 3M ESPE) was built up incrementally. After 24 h water storage at 37 degrees C, the bonded teeth were sectioned into hourglass designs of circular, parabolic, and spline shape, with a ca 1 mm2 cross-sectional area at the bonded interface (n=30). The specimens were subjected to microTBS testing at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. The fracture surfaces were examined under SEM to determine the modes of failure. FEA models were constructed using the TOMECH program. A load of 100 N was applied and the stresses at the bonded interfaces were viewed using the FEMSYS visualization software. RESULTS: One-way ANOVA, Tukey's and Kaplan-Meier tests revealed significant differences in the microTBS for the three designs: 36.7 +/- 8.4, 21.4 +/- 7.9 and 13.8 +/- 4.3 MPa, for the circular, parabolic, and spline hourglass, respectively (p < 0.05). FEA stress distribution data in the adhesive layer showed significant differences among the three designs, which is consistent with the bond strength values. The spline hourglass design showed a three-fold increase in the local stress concentration at its narrowest cross section. CONCLUSION: The specimen geometry greatly influences the measurement of the microTBS. The results are consistent with the FEA predictions.
39
Nicholas J. Robert, Véronique Dièras, John A. Glaspy et al. · Journal of Clinical Oncology · 2011 · 1.1K citations
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacotherapy +15
Roger Stupp, Monika E. Hegi, Thierry Gorlia et al. · The Lancet Oncology · 2014 · 1K citations
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacotherapy +14
Synergistic effect of chemo-photothermal therapy using PEGylated graphene oxide
Wen Zhang, Zhouyi Guo, Deqiu Huang et al. · Biomaterials · 2011 · 885 citations
Natural Sciences, Materials Engineering, Materials Science +16