Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · 2018 · 73 citations · 53 references
PharmacyBioinformaticsMedicinal ChemistryComputational BiologyDrug DiscoveryMachine LearningComputational Drug DiscoveryHigh-throughput ScreeningMolecular DockingProtein-ligand DockingSmall-molecule ScreeningVirtual ScreeningCandidate Compound PrioritizationCompound PrioritizationComputational ScreeningHigh-throughput Virtual ScreeningMulti-task Neural NetworksScreening Algorithm DesignScreening Algorithm DevelopmentScreening Performance Evaluation
Virtual (computational) high-throughput screening provides a strategy for prioritizing compounds for experimental screens, but the choice of virtual screening algorithm depends on the data set and evaluation strategy. We consider a wide range of ligand-based machine learning and docking-based approaches for virtual screening on two protein-protein interactions, PriA-SSB and RMI-FANCM, and present a strategy for choosing which algorithm is best for prospective compound prioritization. Our workflow identifies a random forest as the best algorithm for these targets over more sophisticated neural network-based models. The top 250 predictions from our selected random forest recover 37 of the 54 active compounds from a library of 22,434 new molecules assayed on PriA-SSB. We show that virtual screening methods that perform well on public data sets and synthetic benchmarks, like multi-task neural networks, may not always translate to prospective screening performance on a specific assay of interest.
53
Leo Breiman · Machine Learning · 2001 · 126.2K citations · Full text
Sepp Hochreiter, Jürgen Schmidhuber · Neural Computation · 1997 · 98.1K citations
Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python
Fabián Pedregosa, Gaël Varoquaux, Alexandre Gramfort et al. · arXiv (Cornell University) · 2012 · 63.7K citations · Full text
Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 28
Peter Flach, Meelis Kull · 2015 · 14.7K citations