bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2019 · 15 citations · 37 references
Life SciencesBiologyCell BiologyGene ExpressionGenomicsTranscriptomicsCell Type AnnotationCell-type-specific TranscriptomicsSingle-cell AnalysisSingle-cell GenomicsSingle-cell Rna Sequencing AnalysisSingle-cell TranscriptomicsRna Sequencing (Rna-seq)Single-cell Rna Sequencing
Abstract Single-cell transcriptomic studies are identifying novel cell populations with exciting functional roles in various in vivo contexts, but identification of succinct gene-marker panels for such populations remains a challenge. In this work we introduce COMET, a computational framework for the identification of candidate marker panels consisting of one or more genes for cell populations of interest identified with single-cell RNA-seq data. We show that COMET outperforms other methods for the identification of single-gene panels, and enables, for the first time, prediction of multi-gene marker panels ranked by relevance. Staining by flow-cytometry assay confirmed the accuracy of COMET’s predictions in identifying marker-panels for cellular subtypes, at both the single- and multi-gene levels, validating COMET’s applicability and accuracy in predicting favorable marker-panels from transcriptomic input. COMET is a general non-parametric statistical framework and can be used as-is on various high-throughput datasets in addition to single-cell RNA-sequencing data. COMET is available for use via a web interface ( http://www.cometsc.com ) or a standalone software package ( https://github.com/MSingerlab/COMETSC ).
37
Tissue-based map of the human proteome
Mathias Uhlén, Linn Fagerberg, Björn M. Hallström et al. · Science · 2015 · 15.9K citations · Full text
Spatial reconstruction of single-cell gene expression data
Rahul Satija, Jeffrey A. Farrell, David Gennert et al. · Nature Biotechnology · 2015 · 7.7K citations · Full text
Simultaneous epitope and transcriptome measurement in single cells
Marlon Stoeckius, Christoph Hafemeister, William Stephenson et al. · Nature Methods · 2017 · 3.3K citations · Full text