Royal Society Open Science · 2019 · 59 citations · 51 references
Life SciencesConservation BiologyEcologyPopulation EcologyWildlife BiologyWildlife ManagementHuman-animal InteractionsHuman-wildlife InteractionsSpecies InteractionsWildlife ConservationWildlife EcologyWildlife-habitat RelationshipsAnimal InteractionsForest Landscape StructureHuman-land Use ChangeHuman-predator RelationsHuman-wildlife CoexistenceHuman-wildlife RelationsLivestock-wildlife InteractionsSympatric Species Interaction
Many carnivores inhabit human-dominated landscapes outside protected reserves. Spatially explicit assessments of carnivore distributions and livestock depredation patterns in human-use landscapes are crucial for minimizing negative interactions and fostering coexistence between people and predators. India harbours 23% of the world's carnivore species that share space with 1.3 billion people in approximately 2.3% of the global land area. We examined carnivore distributions and human–carnivore interactions in a multi-use forest landscape in central India. We focused on five sympatric carnivore species: Indian grey wolf Canis lupus pallipes , dhole Cuon alpinus , Indian jackal Canis aureus indicus , Indian fox Vulpes bengalensis and striped hyena Hyaena hyaena . Carnivore occupancy ranged from 12% for dholes to 86% for jackals, mostly influenced by forests, open scrublands and terrain ruggedness. Livestock/poultry depredation probability in the landscape ranged from 21% for dholes to greater than 95% for jackals, influenced by land cover and livestock- or poultry-holding. The five species also showed high spatial overlap with free-ranging dogs, suggesting potential competitive interactions and disease risks, with consequences for human health and safety. Our study provides insights on factors that facilitate and impede co-occurrence between people and predators. Spatial prioritization of carnivore-rich areas and conflict-prone locations could facilitate human–carnivore coexistence in shared habitats. Our framework is ideally suited for making socio-ecological assessments of human–carnivore interactions in other multi-use landscapes and regions, worldwide.
51
ESTIMATING SITE OCCUPANCY RATES WHEN DETECTION PROBABILITIES ARE LESS THAN ONE
Darryl I. MacKenzie, James D. Nichols, Gideon B. Lachman et al. · Ecology · 2002 · 4.4K citations
Stuart Chape, James Harrison, Mark Spalding et al. · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · 2005 · 1.1K citations · Full text
Natural Resources, Biodiversity Conservation, Conservation Biology +14
High and Far: Biases in the Location of Protected Areas
Lucas Joppa, Alexander Pfaff · PLoS ONE · 2009 · 1.1K citations · Full text
Natural Resources, Biodiversity Conservation, Conservation Biology +11
Co-Adaptation Is Key to Coexisting with Large Carnivores
Neil Carter, John D. C. Linnell · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · 2016 · 615 citations · Full text
Life Sciences, Biology, Ecology +11