Publication | Closed Access
ESTIMATING SITE OCCUPANCY RATES WHEN DETECTION PROBABILITIES ARE LESS THAN ONE
4.3K
Citations
24
References
2002
Year
Location TrackingEngineeringData ScienceBiogeographyWildlife EcologyDetection ProbabilitiesSite Occupancy RatesStatistical InferenceModerate Detection ProbabilitiesSocial SciencesHabitat ManagementWildlife BiologyStatisticsLocation InformationSpatial EcologySpecie DistributionConservation Biology
Nondetection of a species at a site does not imply absence unless detection probability is 1. We propose a model and likelihood‑based method for estimating site occupancy rates when detection probabilities are <1. The model is a flexible likelihood framework that incorporates covariates, handles missing observations, and was applied to data on two anuran species from 32 Maryland wetlands collected in 2000. Computer simulations show the model gives generally unbiased occupancy estimates for moderate detection probabilities (>0.3), and application to Maryland wetlands yielded occupancy rates of 0.49 for American toads and 0.85 for spring peepers, exceeding observed proportions.
Nondetection of a species at a site does not imply that the species is absent unless the probability of detection is 1. We propose a model and likelihood-based method for estimating site occupancy rates when detection probabilities are <1. The model provides a flexible framework enabling covariate information to be included and allowing for missing observations. Via computer simulation, we found that the model provides good estimates of the occupancy rates, generally unbiased for moderate detection probabilities (>0.3). We estimated site occupancy rates for two anuran species at 32 wetland sites in Maryland, USA, from data collected during 2000 as part of an amphibian monitoring program, Frogwatch USA. Site occupancy rates were estimated as 0.49 for American toads (Bufo americanus), a 44% increase over the proportion of sites at which they were actually observed, and as 0.85 for spring peepers (Pseudacris crucifer), slightly above the observed proportion of 0.83.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1