The Stata Journal Promoting communications on statistics and Stata · 2020 · 134 citations · 17 references
BusinessAccountancyAccountingMachine LearningPerformance MeasurementPredictive AnalyticsFraud DetectionFraud Risk ManagementArea Under The Receiver Operating Characteristic CurveFraud Detection Evaluation MetricsFraud Detection Performance EvaluationFraud Prediction ModelsOperating Characteristic CurvesPrecision-recall TradeoffPredictive Analytics For FraudPredictive Scoring Models
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves are commonly used to evaluate predictions of binary outcomes. When there is a small percentage of items of interest (as would be the case with fraud detection, for example), ROC curves can provide an inflated view of performance. This can cause challenges in determining which set of predictions is better. In this article, we discuss the conditions under which precision-recall curves may be preferable to ROC curves. As an illustrative example, we compare two commonly used fraud predictors (Beneish’s [1999, Financial Analysts Journal 55: 24–36] M score and Dechow et al.’s [2011, Contemporary Accounting Research 28: 17–82] F score) using both ROC and precision-recall curves. To aid the reader with using precision-recall curves, we also introduce the command prcurve to plot them.
17
An introduction to ROC analysis
Tom Fawcett · Pattern Recognition Letters · 2005 · 21.3K citations
The relationship between Precision-Recall and ROC curves
Jesse Davis, Mark Goadrich · 2006 · 6.3K citations · Full text
Predicting Material Accounting Misstatements*
Patricia Dechow, Weili Ge, Chad R. Larson et al. · Contemporary Accounting Research · 2011 · 1.9K citations