Genome Biology and Evolution · 2019 · 12 citations · 72 references
Life SciencesPlant BiologyPlant SciencesPlant EvolutionPlant GeneticsPlant Molecular BiologyChloroplast BiochemistryChloroplast GeneticsGenome Evolution In PlantsPlant Small Rna BiologyRna EditingRna Processing In PlantsAngiosperm EvolutionChloroplast Rna EditingChloroplast Rna ProcessingEvolution Of Rna EditingNuclear Rna EditingOrthologsRna Editing EnzymesRna Editing In Plastids
Nuclear-encoded pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) proteins are site-specific factors for C-to-U RNA editing in plant organelles coevolving with their targets. Losing an editing target by C-to-T conversion allows for eventual loss of its editing factor, as recently confirmed for editing factors CLB19, CRR28, and RARE1 targeting ancient chloroplast editing sites in flowering plants. Here, we report on alternative evolutionary pathways for DOT4 addressing rpoC1eU488SL, a chloroplast editing site in the RNA polymerase β' subunit mRNA. Upon loss of rpoC1eU488SL by C-to-T conversion, DOT4 got lost multiple times independently in angiosperm evolution with intermediate states of DOT4 orthologs in various stages of degeneration. Surprisingly, we now also observe degeneration and loss of DOT4 despite retention of a C in the editing position (in Carica, Coffea, Vicia, and Spirodela). We find that the cytidine remains unedited, proving that DOT4 was not replaced by another editing factor. Yet another pathway of DOT4 evolution is observed among the Poaceae. Although the rpoC1eU488SL edit has been lost through C-to-T conversion, DOT4 orthologs not only remain conserved but also have their array of PPRs extended by six additional repeats. Here, the loss of the ancient target has likely allowed DOT4 to adapt for a new function. We suggest rps3 antisense transcripts as previously demonstrated in barley (Hordeum vulgare) arising from promotor sequences newly emerging in the rpl16 intron of Poaceae as a new candidate target for the extended PPR stretch of DOT4. Altogether, DOT4 and its target show more flexible pathways for evolution than the previously explored editing factors CLB19, CRR28, and RARE1. Certain plant clades (e.g., Amaranthus, Vaccinium, Carica, the Poaceae, Fabales, and Caryophyllales) show pronounced dynamics in the evolution of editing sites and corresponding factors.
72
Basic local alignment search tool
Stephen F. Altschul, Warren Gish, Webb Miller et al. · Journal of Molecular Biology · 1990 · 94.5K citations
MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 6.0
Koichiro Tamura, Glen Stecher, Daniel S. Peterson et al. · Molecular Biology and Evolution · 2013 · 47.9K citations · Full text
ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates
Subha Kalyaanamoorthy, Bùi Quang Minh, Thomas K. F. Wong et al. · Nature Methods · 2017 · 18.8K citations
WebLogo: A Sequence Logo Generator: Figure 1
Gavin E. Crooks, Gary C. Hon, John‐Marc Chandonia et al. · Genome Research · 2004 · 13K citations · Full text
UFBoot2: Improving the Ultrafast Bootstrap Approximation
Diep Thi Hoang, Olga Chernomor, Arndt von Haeseler et al. · Molecular Biology and Evolution · 2017 · 11K citations · Full text