Publication | Open Access
An End-to-End Multi-Task and Fusion CNN for Inertial-Based Gait Recognition
84
Citations
50
References
2018
Year
Gait AnalysisEngineeringMachine LearningHuman Pose Estimation3D Pose EstimationBiometricsKinesiologyData SciencePattern RecognitionFusion LearningKinematicsRobot LearningHealth SciencesGait RecognitionMachine VisionFeature LearningComputer ScienceDeep LearningFusion CnnComputer VisionHuman IdentificationGait InformationInertial InformationPathological GaitHuman MovementActivity Recognition
People identification using gait information (i.e., the way a person walks) obtained from inertial sensors is a robust approach that can be used in multiple situations where vision-based systems are not applicable. Typically, previous methods use hand-crafted features or deep learning approaches with pre-processed features as input. In contrast, we present a new deep learning-based end-to-end approach that employs raw inertial data as input. By this way, our approach is able to automatically learn the best representations without any constraint introduced by the pre-processed features. Moreover, we study the fusion of information from multiple inertial sensors and multi-task learning from multiple labels per sample. Our proposal is experimentally validated on the challenging dataset OU-ISIR, which is the largest available dataset for gait recognition using inertial information. After conducting an extensive set of experiments to obtain the best hyper-parameters, our approach is able to achieve state-of-the-art results. Specifically, we improve both the identification accuracy (from 83.8% to 94.8%) and the authentication equal-error-rate (from 5.6 to 1.1). Our experimental results suggest that: 1) the use of hand-crafted features is not necessary for this task as deep learning approaches using raw data achieve better results; 2) the fusion of information from multiple sensors allows to improve the results; and, 3) multi-task learning is able to produce a single model that obtains similar or even better results in multiple tasks than the corresponding models trained for a single task.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1