bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2018 · 22 citations · 28 references
MedicineMolecular BiologyOncologyGenomicsMachine LearningMolecular OncologyCancer BiomarkersCancer Early DetectionCancer GenomicsColorectal CancerDna SequencingEarly Cancer DetectionCirculating Cell-free Dna AnalysisCross-validationEarly Stage Disease DetectionEarly Stage Tumor DetectionK-fold Cross-validationK-fold ValidationNext-generation Sequencing-based DetectionWhole-genome Sequencing Analysis
Abstract Background Blood-based methods using cell-free DNA (cfDNA) are under development as an alternative to existing screening tests. However, early-stage detection of cancer using tumor-derived cfDNA has proven challenging because of the small proportion of cfDNA derived from tumor tissue in early-stage disease. A machine learning approach to discover signatures in cfDNA, potentially reflective of both tumor and non-tumor contributions, may represent a promising direction for the early detection of cancer. Methods Whole-genome sequencing was performed on cfDNA extracted from plasma samples (N=546 colorectal cancer and 271 non-cancer controls). Reads aligning to protein-coding gene bodies were extracted, and read counts were normalized. cfDNA tumor fraction was estimated using IchorCNA. Machine learning models were trained using k-fold cross-validation and confounder-based cross-validation to assess generalization performance. Results In a colorectal cancer cohort heavily weighted towards early-stage cancer (80% stage I/II), we achieved a mean AUC of 0.92 (95% CI 0.91-0.93) with a mean sensitivity of 85% (95% CI 83-86%) at 85% specificity. Sensitivity generally increased with tumor stage and increasing tumor fraction. Stratification by age, sequencing batch, and institution demonstrated the impact of these confounders and provided a more accurate assessment of generalization performance. Conclusions A machine learning approach using cfDNA achieved high sensitivity and specificity in a large, predominantly early-stage, colorectal cancer cohort. The possibility of systematic technical and institution-specific biases warrants similar confounder analyses in other studies. Prospective validation of this machine learning method and evaluation of a multi-analyte approach are underway.
28
Rebecca L. Siegel, Kimberly D. Miller, Ahmedin Jemal · CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · 2018 · 17K citations · Full text
Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly con*gs with BWA-MEM
Heng Li · arXiv (Cornell University) · 2014 · 5.8K citations · Full text
Detection of Circulating Tumor DNA in Early- and Late-Stage Human Malignancies
Chetan Bettegowda, Mark Sausen, Rebecca Leary et al. · Science Translational Medicine · 2014 · 5.1K citations · Full text