RMD Open · 2018 · 17 citations · 17 references
MedicinePharmacologyPharmacotherapyClinical PharmacologyPain MedicineRheumatologyAnti-inflammatory PharmacologyChronic Disease PharmacotherapyInflammatory ArthritisInflammatory Disease PharmacotherapyPharmacologic ManagementRheumatoid ArthritisConventional Synthetic Disease-modifying Antirheumatic DrugsDisease Activity MeasurementDisease-modifying Anti-inflammatory DrugsMinimal Disease ActivityRheumatoid Arthritis PainRheumatoid Arthritis PharmacotherapyRheumatoid Arthritis Therapy
OBJECTIVE: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have shown tocilizumab (TCZ) administered intravenously or subcutaneously with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) to be superior to csDMARDs alone for improving rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease activity. This study evaluated the effect of TCZ-intravenous and TCZ-subcutaneous on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in three RCT populations. METHODS: OPTION (NCT00106548), BREVACTA (NCT01232569) and SUMMACTA (NCT01194414) were independent RCTs evaluating the efficacy and safety of TCZ-intravenous and/or TCZ-subcutaneous with csDMARDs in patients with RA. PROs included patient global assessment, pain, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue and Short Form-36. Study outcomes included the proportions of patients reporting changes from baseline in PRO scores ≥ minimum clinically important differences (MCID) and scores ≥ age and gender-matched normative values. RESULTS: In OPTION, more patients who received TCZ-intravenous reported improvements in PROs ≥MCID (50%-82% vs 31%-57%) and scores ≥ normative values (16%-44% vs 5%-28%) at week 16 compared with placebo. Similarly, a greater proportion of patients in BREVACTA who received TCZ-subcutaneous reported improvements ≥ MCID (54%-73% vs 42%-55%) and scores ≥ normative values (8%-34% vs 4%-25%) at week 12 compared with placebo. In SUMMACTA, 61%-84% of patients who received TCZ-subcutaneous and 64%-84% of those who received TCZ-intravenous reported improvements ≥ MCID and 14%-41% and 15%-24%, respectively, scores ≥ normative values at week 24. CONCLUSIONS: TCZ-intravenous or TCZ-subcutaneous with csDMARDs resulted in more patients reporting clinically meaningful improvements and PRO scores ≥ normative values compared with placebo. These improvements were similar with TCZ-intravenous and TCZ-subcutaneous.
17
Lars Klareskog, Désirée van der Heijde, J Jäger et al. · The Lancet · 2004 · 1.8K citations
Josef S Smolen, André Beaulieu, Andrea Rubbert‐Roth et al. · The Lancet · 2008 · 1.4K citations
Medicine, Immunology, Pharmacology +16
Edward Keystone, Arthur F. Kavanaugh, John T. Sharp et al. · Arthritis & Rheumatism · 2004 · 1.2K citations
Paul Emery, Edward Keystone, Hans‐Peter Tony et al. · Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases · 2008 · 1.1K citations · Full text