Ecology · 2018 · 53 citations · 54 references
AgricultureEcologySoil SciencesForest EcologySoil Carbon DynamicsTerrestrial EcologyBiological Nitrogen FixationCarbon FixationEcological StoichiometryEcosystem StoichiometryNitrogen FixationPlant-soil Nutrient InteractionsC:n:p StoichiometryCarbon:nitrogen:phosphorus RatiosCarbon:nitrogen:phosphorus StoichiometryEcosystem Nutrient StoichiometryMetabolic StoichiometryNitrogen Fixation LimitationNitrogen To Phosphorus RatiosNitrogen:phosphorus Ratio
Abstract Lowland tropical forests with chronic nitrogen (N) deposition and/or abundant N‐fixing organisms are commonly rich in N relative to other nutrients. The tropical N richness introduces a paradoxical relationship in which many tropical forests sustain high rates of asymbiotic N fixation despite the soil N richness and the higher energy cost of N fixation than of soil N uptake. However, the mechanism underlying this phenomenon remains unclear. Our study aims to test this phenomenon and examine potential mechanisms of nutrient concentrations vs. substrate stoichiometry in regulating N fixation using multiple linear regression models. We hypothesized that the rates of asymbiotic N fixation would be low in an N‐rich forest under N deposition and substrate stoichiometry would explain the variation in N fixation better than nutrient concentrations. We conducted a chronic N‐addition experiment in an N‐saturated tropical forest in southern China and measured the N fixation rates, carbon (C), N, and phosphorus (P) concentrations, and stoichiometry in different substrates (soil, forest floor, mosses, and canopy leaves). Total N fixation rates were high (10.35–12.43 kg N·ha −1 ·yr −1 ) in this N‐saturated forest because of the high substrate C:N and N:P stoichiometry (which explained 13–52% of the variation in N fixation, P < 0.037) rather than substrate nutrient concentrations ( P > 0.05). Atmospheric N deposition (34–50 kg N·ha −1 ·yr −1 ) failed to down‐regulate asymbiotic N fixation in this forest possibly because the N deposition rate was insufficient to inhibit N fixation or N deposition maintained high N fixation rates by increasing C sequestration in the substrates. Our N‐addition experiment showed the insensitivity of N fixation in all the tested substrates to low N addition (50 kg N·ha −1 ·yr −1 ); however, medium and high N addition (100–150 kg N·ha −1 ·yr −1 ) stimulated the moss and foliar N fixation because of the increases in substrate C:N stoichiometry (which explained 30–34% of the variation in N fixation, P < 0.001). Overall, our results emphasize the importance of substrate (particularly mosses and foliage) stoichiometry as a driver of asymbiotic N fixation and sustained N richness in lowland tropical forests.
54
Nitrogen Cycles: Past, Present, and Future
James N. Galloway, Frank Dentener, Douglas G. Capone et al. · Biogeochemistry · 2004 · 5.4K citations
Evolution of Phosphorus Limitation in Lakes
D. W. Schindler · Science · 1977 · 2.6K citations
The Acetylene-Ethylene Assay for N<sub>2</sub> Fixation: Laboratory and Field Evaluation
R. W. F. Hardy, R. D. Holsten, E. K. Jackson et al. · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · 1968 · 2.3K citations · Full text
Old-growth forests as global carbon sinks
Sebastiaan Luyssaert, Ernst‐Detlef Schulze, Annett Börner et al. · Nature · 2008 · 1.9K citations
Natural Resources, Ecology, Forestry +14