Journal of sensors and sensor systems · 2018 · 23 citations · 7 references
EngineeringMechanical EngineeringMechatronics EngineeringMicroelectromechanical SystemsSensorsUncertainty QuantificationCalibrationDisplacement MeasurementDisplacement SensorsMeasurement UncertaintyMechanical MeasurementSensor CalibrationAccelerometer CalibrationAccelerometersData ProcessingInstrumentation Uncertainty AnalysisMems CalibrationMems MetrologyTest Bench CalibrationUncertainty Assessment
Abstract. A comparison among three methods for the calibration of tri-axial accelerometers, in particular MEMS, is presented in this paper, paying attention to the uncertainty assessment of each method. The first method is performed according to the ISO 16063 standards. Two innovative methods are analysed, both suitable for in-field application. The effects on the whole uncertainty of the following aspects have been evaluated: the test bench performances in realizing the reference motion, the vibration reference sensor, the geometrical parameters and the data processing techniques. The uncertainty contributions due to the offset and the transverse sensitivity are also studied, by calibrating two different types of accelerometers, a piezoelectric one and a capacitive one, to check their effect on the accuracy of the methods under comparison. The reproducibility of methods is demonstrated. Relative uncertainty of methods ranges from 3 to 5 %, depending on the complexity of the model and of the requested operations. The results appear promising for low-cost calibration of new tri-axial accelerometers of MEMS type.
7
Giulio D’Emilia, Antonella Gaspari, Fabrizio Mazzoleni et al. · Journal of sensors and sensor systems · 2018 · 29 citations · Full text
Engineering, Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering +17