Examining Gender and Race Bias in Two Hundred Sentiment Analysis Systems

Svetlana Kiritchenko, Saif M. Mohammad

2018 · 395 citations · 28 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

Machine learning systems can unintentionally amplify human biases, yet prior studies have examined only individual systems and no benchmark dataset exists for bias evaluation. The study introduces the Equity Evaluation Corpus, an 8,640‑sentence dataset designed to uncover race and gender biases in sentiment analysis. The authors applied the EEC to evaluate 219 sentiment analysis systems from the SemEval‑2018 Task 1 shared task. Several systems exhibited statistically significant race or gender bias, consistently assigning higher sentiment intensities to certain groups, and the EEC is released freely.

Abstract

Automatic machine learning systems can inadvertently accentuate and perpetuate inappropriate human biases. Past work on examining inappropriate biases has largely focused on just individual systems. Further, there is no benchmark dataset for examining inappropriate biases in systems. Here for the first time, we present the Equity Evaluation Corpus (EEC), which consists of 8,640 English sentences carefully chosen to tease out biases towards certain races and genders. We use the dataset to examine 219 automatic sentiment analysis systems that took part in a recent shared task, SemEval-2018 Task 1 'Affect in Tweets'. We find that several of the systems show statistically significant bias; that is, they consistently provide slightly higher sentiment intensity predictions for one race or one gender. We make the EEC freely available.

References

28