<i>In vitro</i>,<i>in silico</i>and<i>in vivo</i>study challenges the impact of bronchial thermoplasty on acute airway smooth muscle mass loss

Igor L. Chernyavsky, Richard Russell, Ruth Saunders, G E Morris, Rachid Berair, Amisha Singapuri, Latifa Chachi, Adel Mansur, Peter Howarth, Patrick Dennison,

European Respiratory Journal · 2018 · 65 citations · 17 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Abstract

Bronchial thermoplasty is a treatment for asthma. It is currently unclear whether its histopathological impact is sufficiently explained by the proportion of airway wall that is exposed to temperatures necessary to affect cell survival.Airway smooth muscle and bronchial epithelial cells were exposed to media (37-70°C) for 10 s to mimic thermoplasty. <i>In silico</i> we developed a mathematical model of airway heat distribution post-thermoplasty. <i>In vivo</i> we determined airway smooth muscle mass and epithelial integrity pre- and post-thermoplasty in 14 patients with severe asthma.<i>In vitro</i> airway smooth muscle and epithelial cell number decreased significantly following the addition of media heated to ≥65°C. <i>In silico</i> simulations showed a heterogeneous heat distribution that was amplified in larger airways, with <10% of the airway wall heated to >60°C in airways with an inner radius of ∼4 mm. <i>In vivo</i> at 6 weeks post-thermoplasty, there was an improvement in asthma control (measured <i>via</i> Asthma Control Questionnaire-6; mean difference 0.7, 95% CI 0.1-1.3; p=0.03), airway smooth muscle mass decreased (absolute median reduction 5%, interquartile range (IQR) 0-10; p=0.03) and epithelial integrity increased (14%, IQR 6-29; p=0.007). Neither of the latter two outcomes was related to improved asthma control.Integrated <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in silico</i> modelling suggest that the reduction in airway smooth muscle post-thermoplasty cannot be fully explained by acute heating, and nor did this reduction confer a greater improvement in asthma control.

References

17