Ruxolitinib vs best available therapy for ET intolerant or resistant to hydroxycarbamide

Claire Harrison, Adam J. Mead, Anesh Panchal, Sonia Fox, Christina Yap, Emmanouela Gbandi, Aimee E. Houlton, Samah Alimam, Joanne Ewing, Marion Wood,

Blood · 2017 · 167 citations · 29 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

Abstract

positive ruxolitinib-treated patients. Transformation to myelofibrosis occurred in 1 CMR patient, presumably because of the emergence of a different clone, raising questions about the relevance of CMR in ET patients. Grade 3 and 4 anemia occurred in 19% and 0% of ruxolitinib vs 0% (both grades) in the BAT arm, and grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia in 5.2% and 1.7% of ruxolitinib vs 0% (both grades) of BAT-treated patients. Rates of discontinuation or treatment switching did not differ between the 2 trial arms. The MAJIC-ET trial suggests that ruxolitinib is not superior to current second-line treatments for ET. This trial was registered at www.isrctn.com as #ISRCTN61925716.

References

29