Journal of Construction Engineering and Management · 2017 · 30 citations · 30 references
ManagementFinanceProject ManagementCapital StructureInfrastructure FinanceProject FinanceCapital Structure DesignCapital StructuringInfrastructure FinancingProject FinancingPublic-private Partnership FinanceRisk AllocationCapital Structure Under UncertaintyDynamic Capital Structure AdjustmentDynamic Capital Structure ModelPpp Project FinanceProject Default RiskProject Risk ManagementProject UncertaintyReal Options Approach
Infrastructure project financing and public-private partnerships (PPPs) are underpinned by risk allocation between the public and private sectors. Project performance risks are often passed to the private sector as a contractual risk transfer that is often deterministic and inflexible. In complex projects where there are uncertainties in the scope of work and capital costs, performance risks may need more flexibility with active management on the evolution of project uncertainties over the life of the project’s development. Conventional fixed capital structures and project performance measurements cannot capture the evolution of project performance risks and their dynamics. This paper develops a dynamic capital structure approach that explicitly considers the performance risks of complex projects under uncertainty and allows the capital structure to be adjusted proactively to counter their impact on the project value. Unlike most models that focus on the operational phase when revenues are generated, this paper specifically considers the impact of project performance risks that occur during the development phase. This approach identifies the potential threat of default attributable to project performance risks and allows the private-sector-sponsored project company and lenders to make proactive management decisions using a real-options approach. Numerical results show that such a model can add significant value to a PPP project under uncertainty. Furthermore, numerical tests also show that with the flexibility in adjusting the capital structure, the probability of potential default can also be reduced.
30
Eduardo S. Schwartz, Avinash Dixit, Robert S. Pindyck · The Journal of Finance · 1994 · 9.9K citations
A Guide to the project management body of knowledge
Choice Reviews Online · 1996 · 4.4K citations
Corporate Debt Value, Bond Covenants, and Optimal Capital Structure
Hayne E. Leland · The Journal of Finance · 1994 · 2.9K citations
Dynamic Capital Structure Choice: Theory and Tests
Edwin O. Fischer, Robert Heinkel, Josef Zechner · The Journal of Finance · 1989 · 1.6K citations