Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society · 2017 · 87 citations · 46 references
Natural SciencesEarth SciencesMeteorologyAtmospheric ScienceNumerical Weather PredictionSatellite MeteorologyData AssimilationEnsemble ForecastingEnsemble MethodsKalman FilteringModel Physics ParameterizationNumerical Weather Prediction Data AssimilationAdaptive EstimationAdaptive Parameter EstimationCovariance InflationEnsemble Data AssimilationEnsemble Kalman FilterEnsemble Kalman FilteringEnsemble-based Data AssimilationError Variance Estimation
Covariance inflation plays an important role in the ensemble Kalman filter because the ensemble‐based error variance is usually underestimated due to various factors such as the limited ensemble size and model imperfections. Manual tuning of the inflation parameters by trial and error is computationally expensive; therefore, several studies have proposed approaches to adaptive estimation of the inflation parameters. Among others, this study focuses on the covariance relaxation method which realizes spatially dependent inflation with a spatially homogeneous relaxation parameter. This study performs a series of experiments with the non‐hydrostatic icosahedral atmospheric model ( NICAM ) and the local ensemble transform Kalman filter ( LETKF ) assimilating the real‐world conventional observations and satellite radiances. Two adaptive covariance relaxation methods are implemented: relaxation to prior spread based on Ying and Zhang (adaptive‐ RTPS ), and relaxation to prior perturbation (adaptive‐ RTPP ). Both adaptive‐ RTPS and adaptive‐ RTPP generally improve the analysis compared to a baseline control experiment with an adaptive multiplicative inflation method. However, the adaptive‐ RTPS and adaptive‐ RTPP methods lead to an over‐dispersive (under‐dispersive) ensemble in the sparsely (densely) observed regions compared with the adaptive multiplicative inflation method. We find that the adaptive‐ RTPS and adaptive‐ RTPP methods are robust to a sudden change in the observing networks and observation error settings.
46