Monkeys choose as if maximizing utility compatible with basic principles of revealed preference theory

Alexandre Pastor‐Bernier, Charles R. Plott, Wolfram Schultz

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2017 · 42 citations · 34 references

DOIFull text

Open access

TL;DR

Revealed preference theory examines utility maximization through tradeoffs between goods, extending from biological rewards to tradable economic goods. The study sought to empirically test these assumptions in species closely related to humans to infer a general biological mechanism. Rhesus monkeys repeatedly chose between bundles of two goods in a controlled experiment. Choice frequencies matched indifference curves and passed consistency, transitivity, and other axiomatic tests, indicating well‑structured preferences compatible with utility maximization.

Abstract

Significance Revealed preference theory scrutinizes utility maximization based on tradeoffs between goods. This notion concerns the transition from biological rewards (necessary for survival) to tradable economic goods (beneficial for welfare and evolutionary fitness). However, these assumptions have never been tested empirically in species closely related to humans, as would be necessary to infer a general biological mechanism. In this experiment, rhesus monkeys repeatedly chose between bundles of two goods. Their choice frequencies conformed to curves of equal choice frequency (indifference curves) and satisfied crucial consistency and axiomatic tests involving out-of-sample prediction from modeled indifference curves, transitivity, and axiomatic change of option set size. In satisfying stringent theoretical criteria, the data suggest the existence of well-structured preferences consistent with utility maximization.

References

34