Abstract argumentation for case-based reasoning

Abstract

We investigate case-based reasoning (CBR) problems where cases are represented by abstract factors and (positive or negative) outcomes, and an outcome for a new case, represented by abstract factors, needs to be established.To this end, we employ abstract argumentation (AA) and propose a novel methodology for CBR, called AA-CBR.The argumentative formulation naturally allows to characterise the computation of an outcome as a dialogical process between a proponent and an opponent, and can also be used to extract explanations for why an outcome for a new case is (not) computed.