Labour · 2018 · 23 citations · 48 references
Family MedicineEngineeringA Comparative AnalysisEducationResearch EvaluationPsychologyDifferent MethodsMethodology ComparisonApplied MeasurementPsychological MeasurementStatisticsReliabilityDifferent ApproachesField‐of‐study Mismatch MeasuresResearch DesignField‐of‐study MismatchResearch SynthesisMethodological ArticleError AnalysisEducational AssessmentSurvey Methodology
Abstract We compare the different methods used to measure field‐of‐study mismatch. A first part reviews the literature, detailing, and discussing the different approaches. A second part uses a dataset allowing one to investigate whether these different approaches result in differences with respect to the incidence and determinants of field‐of‐study mismatch. As substantial differences do indeed exist, even among variants of similar approaches, we conclude that empirical results should be interpreted with caution. While making several recommendations concerning the measurement of field‐of‐study mismatch, we also call for more focused research on the validity and reliability of field‐of‐study mismatch measures.
48
Ability sorting and the returns to college major
Peter Arcidiacono · Journal of Econometrics · 2003 · 830 citations
Overeducation in the Labour Market
Séamus McGuinness · Journal of Economic Surveys · 2006 · 812 citations