Concepedia

Comparison of the Dynesys Dynamic Stabilization System and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Disease

Yang Zhang, Jianlin Shan, Xiumei Liu, Fang Li, Kai Guan, Tiansheng Sun

PLoS ONE · 2016 · 48 citations · 20 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Abstract

Both Dynesys and PLIF can improve the clinical outcomes for lumbar degenerative disease. Compared to PLIF, Dynesys stabilization partially preserves the ROM of the stabilized segments, limits hypermobility in the upper adjacent segment, and may prevent the occurrence of ASD.

References

20

The dynamic neutralization system for the spine: a multi-center study of a novel non-fusion system

Thomas Stoll, Gilles Dubois, Othmar Schwarzenbach · European Spine Journal · 2002 · 410 citations · Full text

, , +9

Dynamic Stabilization of the Lumbar Spine and Its Effects on Adjacent Segments

Werner Schmoelz, J. Huber, Thomas Nydegger et al. · Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques · 2003 · 326 citations

, , +17

Minimum Four-Year Follow-up of Spinal Stenosis With Degenerative Spondylolisthesis Treated With Decompression and Dynamic Stabilization

Stefan Schaeren, Ivan Broger, B. Jeanneret · Spine · 2008 · 203 citations

Adjacent segment degeneration after instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion: a prospective cohort study with a minimum five-year follow-up

Jigar Anandjiwala, Jun-Yeong Seo, Kee-Yong Ha et al. · European Spine Journal · 2011 · 142 citations · Full text

, , +8

Mini-Open Versus Conventional Open Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis

Takahiro Tsutsumimoto, Mitsuhiko Shimogata, Hiroshi Ohta et al. · Spine · 2009 · 140 citations · Full text