American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology · 1999 · 31 citations · 29 references
MedicineCardiologyPharmacologyClinical PharmacologyExperimental PharmacologyPharmacodynamicsCardiovascular DiseaseCardiovascular MedicineCardiovascular PathophysiologyCardiovascular PharmacologyBlood FlowEndothelin Receptor AntagonistsEndothelin Receptor SignalingReceptor Activation MechanismsReceptors
Nitric oxide (NO) may normally impair endothelin (ET) activity in epicardial coronary arteries. Lifting this inhibitory feedback could reveal ET-dependent effects involving ET(A)- and/or ET(B)-receptor activation. In conscious dogs, the blockade of ET(A) receptors (intracoronary Ro-61-1790) increased external circumflex coronary artery diameter (CD) (sonomicrometry) by 0.10 +/- 0.01 from 3.04 +/- 0.12 mm (P < 0.01) without altering coronary blood flow (Doppler). Similarly, CD increased (0.09 +/- 0.01 from 2.91 +/- 0.14 mm; P < 0. 01) when Ro-61-1790 was given after blockade of NO formation with intracoronary N(omega)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME). In contrast, ET(B)-receptor blockade (intracoronary Ro-46-8443) did not influence baseline CD with and without L-NAME. In vitro, increases in tension caused by N(omega)-nitro-L-arginine (L-NNA) or PGF(2alpha) in arterial rings were reduced by ET(A)- but not ET(B)-receptor blockade. ET(A)-receptor blockade also reduced the increase in tension caused by L-NNA in human coronary arterial rings. Thus ET(A) receptors, but not ET(B) receptors, account for ET-dependent constriction in canine epicardial coronary arteries in vivo. ET-dependent effects were independent of the level of NO formation in vitro and in vivo. In human epicardial coronary arterial rings, ET(A)-receptor blockade also caused significant relaxation.
29
Gilberto De Nucci, Ranjeny Thomas, Pedro D’Orléans-Juste et al. · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 1988 · 1.4K citations · Full text
Medicine, Pharmacology, Physiology +12