Publication | Closed Access
Influence of monensin on Holstein steers fed high-concentrate diets containing soybean meal or urea.
63
Citations
0
References
1997
Year
NutritionAgricultural EconomicsHigh-concentrate DietsEducationSoybean DietFeed UtilizationHolstein SteersFeed AdditiveAnimal FeedSoybean MealPublic HealthAnimal ProductionAnimal PhysiologyAnimal NutritionFeed EvaluationAmino AcidAnimal SciencePhysiologyFeed IntakeMetabolism
We conducted two growth trials to evaluate the effects of monensin on amino acid sparing. When Holstein steers were fed a 90% concentrate diet supplemented with soybean meal (13.5% CP), the DMI, ADG, and efficiencies of feed and nitrogen utilization were greater than with urea (P < .10). Monensin improved ADG with both nitrogen supplements (P < .01), but the positive effects of monensin on efficiencies of feed (P = .12) and nitrogen (P = .26) utilization were greater for soybean meal than for urea. Increasing amounts of monensin (0, 11, or 22 mg/kg of DM) caused a linear increase in DMI with urea. Diets with soybean had greater intakes than diets with urea (P < .01); the greatest intake was of a soybean diet with monensin at 11 mg/kg of DM. Holstein steers fed soybean meal at 13.5% CP had lower DMI and greater efficiencies of feed and nitrogen utilization than steers fed 16.7% CP (P < .10). Crude protein level had no effect on ADG (P > .10). Monensin always increased the efficiencies of feed and nitrogen utilization (P < .05), but these trends were greater for diets with 16.7 than for those with 13.5% CP. Overall, monensin decreased DMI (P < .01), but this effect was greater for 16.7% than for 13.5% CP. Because the positive effects of monensin on diet NEg (P = .16) and efficiency of nitrogen utilization (P = .26) were greater for soybean meal than for urea, it seemed that monensin was sparing amino acids.