Publication | Closed Access
Figurative Framing: Shaping Public Discourse Through Metaphor, Hyperbole, and Irony
293
Citations
62
References
2016
Year
Figurative FramingPragmatic AnalysisRhetoricCommunicationPublic DebateMedia StudiesJournalismDiscourse AnalysisConversation AnalysisPolitical CommunicationLanguage StudiesPublic SphereSocial RepresentationsTheatreMessage FramingCommunication StudyPoeticsPragmaticsFrame BuildingPhilosophy Of LanguageInterpersonal CommunicationFraming EffectsVisual MetaphorArtsComplex Figurative Frames
Framing is a key communication concept, but most studies focus on single‑issue frames. The authors extend framing theory by proposing figurative framing—using metaphor, hyperbole, and irony—to shape public discourse and outline a research agenda linking it to core framing processes. They analyze how each figurative device—metaphor, hyperbole, irony—frames societal issues and then examine combined figurative frames.
Framing is an important concept in communication, yet many framing studies set out to develop frames relevant to only one issue. We expand framing theory by introducing figurative framing. We posit that figurative language types like metaphor, hyperbole and irony are important in shaping public discourse, because these figures contain important linguistic and conceptual content about the issue under discussion. We first explicate the role of each individual figure (metaphor, hyperbole, and irony) in the framing of important societal issues. Then, we focus on complex figurative frames (combinations of metaphor, hyperbole, and/or irony). The article concludes with a research agenda, connecting figurative framing to the four key processes in framing research (frame building, frame setting, individual-level effects, and feedback loop).
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1