The Canadian Entomologist · 1986 · 46 citations · 16 references
AgricultureEcologyWeed ScienceBiological ControlWeed BiologyWeed EcologyBiological Weed ControlPest ControlWeed ControlWeed ManagementBiological Control EfficacyBiotic InteractionsEcology MisconceptionsScientific MisconceptionsTarget Weed SelectionWeed Control Systems
Abstract The “new approach” to selecting biological control agents, as proposed by Hokkanen and Pimentel in 1984, through the use of new exploiter–victim associations is inappropriate for the biological control of weeds because of certain misconceptions in their method. Examples of biological control of weeds cited in their analysis were biased towards cactaceous insects, and cacti are not representative of target weeds. Several of their “new” associations were inaccurate. These inaccuracies are discussed and additional examples are provided to refute the proposed method. Contrary to the recommendation of Hokkanen and Pimentel, new exploiter-victim associations offer limited opportunities for biological control of non-cactaceous weeds with insects, and should not be used as the preferred method in selecting biotic agents for the biological control of weeds.
16
Rachel McFadyen · Annual Review of Entomology · 1998 · 953 citations
Biological Control of Weeds. A World Catalogue of Agents and their Target Weeds.
M. Webb · Plant Pathology · 1999 · 320 citations · Full text
Agriculture, Botany, Weed Science +16
Successful biological control of the floating weed salvinia
P. M. Room, K. L. S. Harley, I. W. Forno et al. · Nature · 1981 · 223 citations